Accessed 2013 Jul 2" href="#footnote2_ybr2bkl" Both the carbon-14 dating results and the discovery of soft tissue in incompletely fossilized dinosaur bones share the common theme of being indicators of much younger ages for dinosaurs than evolution claims.Compared to the conventional theory of dinosaurs’ being at minimum 65 million years old, the time it would take soft tissue to degrade and the Each of the two thousand meeting participants was given a disc which included the abstract of the carbon-14 dating report.It's accuracy has been verified by using C-14 to date artifacts whose age is known historically.The fluctuation of the amount of C-14 in the atmosphere over time adds a small uncertainty, but contamination by "modern carbon" such as decayed organic matter from soils poses a greater possibility for error. Thomas Seiler, a physicist from Germany, gave the presentation in Singapore.* Three Related Lines of Evidence Shoring Up the Young Earth Interpretation: The interaction between dinosaur soft tissue, unracemized left-handed amino acids, and Carbon 14 must all be explained to understand the true age of the geologic column.
Scientists find out the age of a dinosaur fossil by dating not only the rocks in which it lies, but those below and above it.
The age for all these fossils was found to be less than 50,000 years1.
This is not predicted by conventional evolutionary theory; and other discoveries have been made concerning dinosaurs which also are not predicted by evolutionary theory such as the discovery of soft tissue in bones that are not or are only partially fossilized.
The preferred method of dating dinosaur fossils is with the radiometric dating method.
And the result of this accepted method dates dinosaur fossils to around 68 million years old. Its half-life ($t_$) is only 5,730 years—that is, every 5,730 years, half of it decays away.